Falsificationism and Research Programmes: Impact of Popper and Lakatos on Economic Methodology
- Authors
-
-
John Owen E. Adimike
Dominican University, Ibadan
Author
-
- Keywords:
- Falsificationism, Methodology of scientific research programmes, Economic methodology, Economic theories, Empirical criticism, Empirical content
- Abstract
-
In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosian methodology of scientific research programmes [subsequently, MSRP] on economic methodology and philosophy of economics. The central thesis I maintain is that neither Popper’s falsificationism nor Lakatos’ MSRP offers [philosophy of] economics a proper condition for the reception or rejection of economic theories. With this achieved, I highlight some implications and caveats of this argument by way of conclusion.
- References
- Downloads
- Published
- 2022-12-15
- Section
- Articles
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Rev. Fr. Prof. Joseph Thomas Ekong, OP, The ‘Is-Ought’ Controversy between Hart and Fuller in the Philosophy of Law: Implications for Judicial Procedures and the Criminal Justice System , DU Journal of Humanities: Vol. 3 (2022): June, 2022
- Jim Ijenwa Unah, PhD, FNPA, FNAL, Philosophy and the Restoration of Public Trust in Governance , DU Journal of Humanities: Vol. 1 (2021): June, 2021
- Paul Oluwatosin Agordi, Cartesian Dualism and Its Metaphysical Implications in Today's Philosophical Landscape , DU Journal of Humanities: Vol. 9 (2025): June, 2025
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.